Jesus’s compassion extends to all people; even foreigners. How can we be like Jesus? Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 15:29-39 Jesus’s compassion extends to all people; even foreigners. How can we be like Jesus? James Tissot (1836-1902). La multiplication des pains [The Multiplication of the Loaves] . Between 1886 and 1894. Brooklyn Museum, New York, NY. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brooklyn_Museum_-_The_Miracle_of_the_Loaves_and_Fishes_(La_multiplication_des_pains)_by_James_Tissot.jpg . Tom Faletti June 13, 2025 Matthew 15:29-31 Crowds come to be healed Although some Bibles have a footnote on this passage suggesting that these crowds may be Jews, there is overwhelming evidence that in this scene and the next, where Jesus feeds the 4,000, he is in Gentile territory: Jesus and the disciples were in Gentile territory in the previous passage. To get to this location, Jesus walks by the Sea of Galilee and continues on. Mark 7:31 tells us that he went by the Sea of Galilee to the Decapolis, which was Gentile territory southeast of the Sea of Galilee. In the next passage – the feeding of the 4,000 (Matt. 15:32-39) – Matthew uses language that clearly signals that they are in Gentile territory. In the next chapter, he will be in the Gentile region of Caesarea Philippi (Matt. 16:13), north of the Sea of Galilee. Matthew doesn’t tell us Jesus is back in Jewish territory again until Matthew 17:22-24. So it is pure supposition to put Jesus back in Jewish territory for this incident. Furthermore, this period of ministry in Gentile territory is central to the entire arc of the narrative of Matthew’s Gospel (see the study Matt. 1:1-17 ). Matthew foreshadows in the early chapters that Jesus is for all people, Jewish and the Gentile, and then shows Jesus teaching and working miracles first in Jewish territory and then in Gentile territory before he goes to Jerusalem, dies, rises back to life, and tells the disciples to take the gospel to all nations. In Matthew 5:1, Jesus went up on a mountain to teach the Jewish crowds in the “Sermon on the Mount” at the beginning of his ministry (Luke placed Jesus on a plain for this sermon). Here, Matthew tells us that Jesus went up on another mountain, this time in Gentile territory. What do you think Matthew is signaling to us by placing Jesus on mountains in these passages? What kinds of people come to Jesus on the mountain? Why do you think they are coming to him and bringing sick people to him? What does Jesus do? Considering Jewish attitudes toward non-Jews (Gentiles) at the time of Jesus, how significant is it that Jesus is healing all the Gentiles who come to him? Why were the crowds amazed, and how did they react? Notice in verse 31 that the people “glorified the God of Israel.” This is the only time Matthew uses the phrase “the God of Israel,” and Mark and John never use it at all (Luke uses it only once). It would be rather redundant to say that Jewish people “glorified the God of Israel” – you would just say they glorified God. But this is exactly what Gentiles would say. Since the God of the Jews was not their God and they did not believe in the God of Israel, if they now wanted to acknowledge that God they would call him “the God of Israel.” Why is it significant that these Gentiles are praising the God of Israel? Jesus has made a significant breakthrough: crowds of Gentiles are honoring the God of the Jews, the one true God. How do you think Jesus felt when he saw Gentiles, who did not believe in the one true God the Jews believed in, now glorifying the God of Israel because of his healings? If scholars are right that one of the reasons Jesus “withdrew” from Jewish territory was to get away from the Jewish crowds and prepare his disciples for what was to come, what lessons do you think his disciples were learning, or were supposed to be learning, from watching what he is doing? Are there times when we need to re-learn that the mercy of God is for everyone? How can we be as willing to minister to foreigners as Jesus was? How might we bring this example of caring for the foreigner into our society and help our society be more caring about foreigners? Matthew 15:32-39 The feeding of the 4,000 Jesus has been healing people, and probably teaching them too (that’s what he did when he sat down on a mountain for the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5:1). How do you think Jesus feels about this crowd who has bene with him for 3 days? What does Jesus do? How are the details of this story different than the details of the feeding of the 5,000 (Matt. 14:13-21)? Some scholars think the only differences between the feeding of the 5,000 and the feeding of the 4,000 are the numbers, so they suggest that these are two different tellings of the same story. They have missed key information and jumped to a false conclusion. William Barclay, who was an expert in the Greek language of the New Testament, found nuances that others missed. In this passage, he finds clear evidence that the people fed here are living in a Gentile culture, and that therefore this is a different event than the feeding of the 5,000 in Jewish territory. He writes: “When Jesus fed the five thousand (Matt. 14:15-21; Mark 6:31-44), we read that they sat down on the green grass (Matt. 14:19; Mark 6:39). It was therefore the spring time, for at no other time would the grass be green in that hot land. On this occasion when the crowd are bidden to sit down, they sit on the ground ( epi tēn gēn ) , on the earth; it was by this time high summer and the grass was scorched leaving only the bare earth…. The people and the place are different. The feeding of the four thousand in this passage took place in Decapolis; Decapolis literally means ten cities , and the Decapolis was a loose federation of ten free Greek cities. On this occasion there would be many Gentiles present, perhaps more Gentiles than Jews. It is that fact that explains the curious phrase in Matthew 15:31, ‘They glorified the God of Israel.’ To the Gentile crowds this was a demonstration of the power of the God of Israel. There is another curious little hint of difference. In the feeding of the five thousand the baskets which were used to take up the fragments are called kophinoi ; in the feeding of the four thousand they are called sphurides . The kophinos was a narrow-necked, flask-shaped basket which Jews often carried with them, for a Jew often carried his own food, lest he should be compelled to eat food which had been touched by Gentile hands and which was therefore unclean. The sphuris was much more like a hamper; it could be big enough to carry a man, and it was a kind of basket that a Gentile would use.” (Barclay, The Gospel of Matthew, Volume 2 , pp. 138-139). Matthew says they “ate and were satisfied” (Matt. 15:37, NABRE) (or “filled,” NRSV). What does that phrase say to you: they ate and were satisfied? Jesus called himself the Bread of Life (John 6:35), and at the Supper he broke bread, gave it to his disciples, and said, “This is my body.” Given the overtones of Eucharist or Holy Communion when Jesus feeds the people with bread, what are the spiritual implications of this story? Going beyond the event itself, what deeper spiritual message does it offer you? This story has a spiritual dimension, but it also has a practical, physical dimension. God does not want anyone to go hungry. God explicitly calls us to feed the hungry (Matt. 25:35; Is. 58:7; Prov. 22:9). What does the fact that in Jesus’s ministry all the people “ate and were filled” say to us about our responsibility for the hungry? Despite Jesus’s teaching and example, millions of people regularly go hungry in our nation and hundreds of millions of people go hungry around the world. As Christians and followers of Jesus, what should we do about it? Jesus had compassion for the crowd of Jews in Matthew 14:14, and he has compassion for this crowd of Gentiles (Matt. 15:32). He cares for everyone. How are we called to have God’s compassion for whoever is in need, regardless of whether they are part of “our” people? What can we do to extend God’s compassion to others? How can we find tangible ways to show care for people who are not of our own race, nationality, ethnic group, class, religion, or church? How might this set of passages about Jesus’s ministry to the Gentiles (15:21-39) be seen as a follow-on to the previous passage (15:10-20) about what is and is not unclean? And what does it say to us? Jesus showed that the Gentiles are not unclean. No one is unclean. No one is excluded from the being fed by the Lord. God is accessible to all and has compassion for everyone. How might this insight be applied to marginalized groups in our society today? What can you do to be like Jesus here? Take a step back and consider this: The feeding of the 5,000 comes near the end of Jesus’s public ministry to the Jews in chapters 5-14. The feeding of the 4,000 comes near the end of this period of time when Jesus has been ministering to the Gentiles. The Last Supper comes at the end of Jesus’s ministry in Jerusalem before his crucifixion and resurrection. How central to our faith is the image of being fed by the Lord? Why? How central to your faith is the idea of feeding at the table of the Lord? Why? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

Jesus cares about our afflictions. Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 8:1-17 Jesus cares about our afflictions. Alexandre Bida (1813-1895). The Leper . 1875. Detail. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jesus_heals_the_leper.png . See also https://archive.org/details/christinartstory00egglrich/page/60/mode/2up . Tom Faletti July 30, 2024 Re-read Matthew 7:28-29 Jesus acts with authority Matthew ends the Sermon on the Mount by saying that Jesus “taught them as one having authority and not as their scribes.” What does it look like when someone teaches with authority? Who has been someone who taught with authority in your life? Matthew has shown Jesus teaching with authority. Now he is going to show Jesus acting with authority. In chapters 8 and 9, we will see 10 miracles in 9 separate incidents, presented in groups of 3, interspersed with brief but pointed dialogues. Matthew 8:1-17 Jesus cures all who come to him Who are the kinds of people Jesus helps here? Who is Jesus for ? The ones Jesus helped here include an outcast leper, a lowly servant, an enemy commander in need, a mother-in-law who probably spent most of her life being overlooked, and then many others who suffered various afflictions. What does this tell you about Jesus and about Matthew’s sense of who Jesus cares about – who God cares about? Who do we care about? Do we care about the same people Jesus cares about? Explain. How are Jesus’s priorities a challenge to our society? Now let’s focus on each of these three stories separately. Matthew 8:1-4 the leper What happens in this passage? Recent translations of the Bible mostly replace “a leper” with “a man with a skin disease,” because the word was used for a variety of skin diseases, not just leprosy. Any persistent skin disease rendered a person unclean, under Old Testament law (Lev. 13-14), both in a hygienic sense (such diseases can be transmitted through touch) and in a religious sense (ritual impurity). Therefore, people with skin diseases were supposed to live in isolation, away from others. What attitudes or character traits does the man with leprosy show? In verse 2, the man said, “You can make me clean.” What is the significance of being made clean? How were lepers treated and what would being made “clean” do for him? What does Jesus do? Why is touching so significant beyond just being an action used in the healing? Jesus’s willingness to touch the man violated Old Testament norms both with regard to health and with regard to religious purity, so it was probably shocking to onlookers. In what way does Jesus’s touching the man communicate not only a willingness to violate social conventions but also a special type of caring? What effect does touching someone have? Why does Jesus tell him to tell no one? Why does Jesus tell him to go to the priests? Note that the purpose of going to the priests is to satisfy the priests; Jesus does not make it his own concern – i.e., he does not say, for example, that going to the priests was necessary in order to receive the healing. Jesus stands above the Law, even as he tells the man to fulfill the Law. What do you discern about Jesus’s/God’s character from this incident? Who are we called to “touch” or care for today in or lives, in order for them to receive God’s healing? How might our choice to “touch” people whom society shuns shock people around us, and should that affect us? What should we do about the fact that if we follow Jesus we will sometimes show care for people that others think we should stay away from? Matthew 8:5-13 the centurion’s slave A centurion was a commander of 100 men in the Roman army. He was a Gentile. The Greek word for the centurion’s “servant” is ambiguous and could mean “son.” John 4:46-54 has a similar but not identical story about a royal official’s son. But if we follow the common understanding that it is the centurion’s servant who is sick, how do you think he felt about this servant cared as a person? The centurion was an officer in a hated army that occupied the land, oppressed the people, and treated with harsh brutality anyone who dared to cross it. Why would Jesus want to help him? Jesus says, “I will come and cure him.” What Jewish cultural expectation would that have been violating? Observant Jews did not enter the homes of Gentiles, because they would becoming ritually unclean from any interaction with any unclean items in the home. Why do you think Jesus makes the offer to “come”? How does the centurion see himself relative to Jesus (verse 8) and relative to other people (verse 9)? What does he ask Jesus to do? Why does the centurion think that a word from Jesus will be enough? Matthew 7 ended with a reference to Jesus’s authority. How does this passage help us understand the authority of Jesus? For what does Jesus praise the centurion? What does he think of the centurion’s faith? How does Jesus turn this event into an indictment of the failure of the people of Israel to believe in Jesus? How can we be more like the centurion? Note: We can’t conjure up faith by our own willpower. Faith is a gift. But we can choose to be open, we can take the time to approach God, and we can welcome God’s presence and lordship in our lives. If we create the conditions for faith by nurturing whatever seed of faith we have, that openness can allow faith to grow. Matthew 8:14-17 Peter’s mother-in-law, and many other people What does Peter’s mother-in-law do when she is healed? How can she be a model for us? What happens that evening? In verse 17, what Old Testament passage does Matthew quote, and what does it mean? What is Matthew trying to suggest to us about Jesus? The quote is from one of the Suffering Servant passages of Isaiah, and the Suffering Servant ultimately makes reparation for the sins of the people, so Matthew sees it as a prophecy about Jesus as the Messiah. Take a step back and consider this: In Matthew 8:2, the leper is confident that Jesus can cure him; he is only unsure if Jesus is willing to cure him (he says, “if you wish”). In Matthew 8:8, the centurion is confident that Jesus can cure his servant, and he has a solution to the question of Jesus’s willingness (“only say the word”). With both of those issues laid to rest, the crowds that follow Jesus come with great expectation. When it comes to asking God for healing for yourself or others, do you get stuck on the question of whether God wishes to heal? Do you get stuck on the question of whether God is able to heal? Or are you able to get past both of those questions? In our time, we know that some people for whom we pray are healed and some are not. How do you approach God when healing is needed? There is power in the passage from Isaiah that Matthew applies to Jesus in verse 17. In what ways do you find it to be true of Jesus that he bears our weaknesses and diseases, and how does that help you to approach him in prayer? The next time you pray, how can you approach the Lord with greater confidence that he bears your afflictions? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

Living parables: Incidents in Jesus’s ministry that tell a bigger story, including the feeding of the 5,000. [Matthew 13:54-58; 14:1-12; 14:13-21] Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 13:54-14:21 Living parables: Incidents in Jesus’s ministry that tell a bigger story, including the feeding of the 5,000. The feeding of the multitude. Hagia Sophia, Trabzon, Türkiye. Late 13th century fresco. Photo by Dosseman (Dick Osseman), 6 Sept. 2018, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trabzon_Hagia_Sophia_Feeding_of_the_thousands_93_080.jpg . Tom Faletti June 6, 2025 In chapter 13, Matthew gathered together a broad group of Jesus’s parables. Now, from Matthew 13:54 through chapter 14, Matthew gathers together some of Jesus’s actions that might be thought of as living parables : stories that reveal something bigger than just what happens in the story. Matthew 13:54-58 Rejection in his hometown of Nazareth What does verse 54 tell us that Jesus does? How do the people react? At root, what is the reason Jesus is not accepted in Nazareth? What is beneath their doubt? Is it jealousy? Insistence on upholding the accepted social hierarchy? Something else? Do you think the proverb quoted in verse 57 is true most of the time, or only occasionally? Explain. Verse 58 says Jesus did not do many miracles there. Why? Read Mark 6:5-6 , which provides a bit more detail. Why do you think that some people who were sick were able to be healed by Jesus? Matthew 13:58 says that Jesus did not do many miracles there, but Mark 6:5 says that Jesus was not able to do many miracles. Most scholars believe Mark’s Gospel was written first, and that Matthew drew from Mark. There are a variety of places where it appears that Matthew made edits to Mark’s words as he incorporated them into his Gospel. In this case, perhaps he did not want to imply that Jesus could be limited. Do you think the reason so few miracles were done was because Jesus did not want to heal people who didn’t believe in him, or because their lack of faith did not provide the right conditions for him to act? Explain. How might we be preventing God from acting mightily in our lives due to our lack of faith? How is this reaction of the people of Nazareth a living example of the parable of the sower and the soils? If we take this story as a living parable illustrating a bigger point for the early church and for us, what might that point be? Matthew 14:1-12 The death of John the Baptist Herod the tetrarch was a son of Herod the Great (the one who tried to have Jesus killed as a baby) and inherited one fourth of Herod’s territory – including Galilee. What happened to John the Baptist? Why had John criticized Herod? Why was John the Baptist killed? According to Jewish historian Josephus, Herod had John killed because he was afraid that John had become so popular that he could start a rebellion (Barclay, The Gospel of Matthew, Volume 2 , pp. 103-104). Is that plausible? From Herod’s perspective, why was John killed? From Herodias’s perspective, why was John killed? From Salome’s perspective, why was John killed? From the perspective of the early Christians, why was John killed? From Herod’s perspective, the matter is political and personal, and eventually touches on his ego and his social standing. From Herodias’s perspective, the matter is personal and also touches on her legitimacy as Herod’s wife, so it is vindication. From Salome’s perspective, it is something she can do for her mother, and also possibly for power. For the early church, John’s death is a passing of the torch and is also a foreshadowing. John was committed to speaking the truth and died honorably for it. Herod was committed to upholding a foolish vow even though it meant an innocent man would die. Staying true to your word doesn’t make you honorable if it means doing something wrong. How do you know when you should stick with a commitment? Should you ever let a commitment go unfulfilled? If we follow Jesus’s command to not swear by anything (Matt. 5:34-37), we will never be in a position where we have to choose between going back on an oath or doing something evil. Some people think Herod was experiencing guilt for what he had done, and that is why he imagined that Jesus might be John, raised back to life. John the Baptist was Jesus’s cousin. They probably had times together when they were growing up. How might Jesus have reacted to John’s execution? According to John 1:35-42, some of the disciples started out as followers of John. How might they have reacted to John’s death? If this story is a living parable illustrating a bigger point for the early church and for us, what might that point be? Matthew 14:13-21 Jesus feeds 5,000 We use the shorthand phrase that Jesus fed 5,000 people, but verse 21 tells us that it was 5,000 men, plus the woman and children who accompanied them; so it was actually far more than 5,000 people. Why do you think Jesus withdrew to a deserted place? How do you think he felt when the people found him so quickly? When Jesus saw the crowd, he had “compassion” for them. What does this say to you? What happens in this story? What does this story tell us about Jesus? What does this story tell us about the crowds of people? They were focused on wanting to be with Jesus, so focused that they chased after him and didn’t pack their bags first. They may not have always been thinking clearly, but they were orderly and open to God. What does it tell us about the disciples? They were caring and practical, even though they didn’t have a miracle in mind. They didn’t know Jesus would care so much. They were instruments of God’s miraculous work. Put yourself in this story. Where would you have been, and what would you have been thinking about what happened? What do you think God wants us to learn from the fact that there were so many leftovers? What do you think God wants us to learn from the fact that so many people were fed? What does this overall story say to you? Why do you think God doesn’t multiply food all the time? Hundreds of millions of people go hungry every day. Nine million people die from hunger every year, including 3 million children. Why do you think God doesn’t feed them all, as Jesus fed everyone here? Note that although God doesn’t fix everything for us, he always welcomes what we bring to him and seeks to transform it to do more – when they said they had 5 loaves and 2 fish, Jesus said, “Bring them here to me” (Matt. 14:18). This story is so central to story of Jesus that it is the only miracle (other than the Resurrection) that is told in all 4 gospels. Christians of all stripes see this story as far more than just a story about a good thing happening to 5,000+ people. It illustrates much bigger points about God and our relationship with God. If this story is a living parable illustrating a bigger point for the early church and for us, what might that point be? From this story, people often draw lessons about the power of God, God’s provision for us, God’s love for us, how much can be done when we take what little have and hand it over to God to what he wants with it, etc. There are some bigger points here as well: First, this story is an anticipation of the Eucharist (Communion), through which God feeds us spiritually today. The language in Matthew 14:19, where Jesus “looked up to heaven” (perhaps in prayer), “blessed and broke the loaves,” and “gave them to the disciples,” is very similar to the actions he took at the Last Supper when he instituted the Eucharist/Holy Communion (Matthew 26:26). What connections would you make between this miracle and the Eucharist/Holy Communion? Second, it can be interpreted as a foreshadowing of the eternal banquet which we will enjoy with God forever in heaven (see Matt. 8:11; Rev. 19:9). What connections would you make between this miracle and the heavenly banquet God is preparing for us? Take a step back and consider this: The Bible shows that God loves situations where lots of people are fed: We see this in the scenes where Jesus feeds thousands of people (Matt. 15:29-39 as well as Matt. 14:13-21). We see it in Jesus’s imagery of heaven as a place where feasting is the norm (Matt. 8:11; Matt. 26:29; Luke 22:29-30; Matt. 22:1-14). We see it in John’s vision of heaven (Rev. 19:9). We see it in the Old Testament, in God’s provision for the Israelites in the dessert (Ex. 16), in the celebration of the Passover feast (Ex. 12:1-28; Num. 9:1-14; Deut. 16:1-8), and in prophecies of the future (Isaiah 25:6). Clearly, God loves feasts and wants us to associate good eating with him. How can you make every meal a reminder of God’s love and a celebration of God’s provision for us? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

The Gospel of John shows us Jesus Christ, who is both God and man and Son of the Father. It provides spiritual insights that go beyond what the other Gospels have, so that we can believe and have life. Previous Next John List Introduction to John The Gospel of John shows us Jesus Christ, who is both God and man and Son of the Father. It provides spiritual insights that go beyond what the other Gospels have, so that we can believe and have life. Image provided by Wix. Tom Faletti October 31, 2025 Introduction: Background Regarding the Gospel of John (This background information is a synthesis of the scholarship presented in many sources, including the following: Brown, Introduction , pp. 362-376; Brown, The Community , pp. 22-24, 166-182; Bruce, pp. 1-12; Flanagan, pp. 101-104, 119-121; Perkins, pp. 942-950; Sloyan, pp. 8-28; Ignatius Catholic Study Bible , pp. 157-158; Ellis, pp. 1230-1231; and New American Bible, revised edition , New Testament, pp. 142-144.) Why was the Gospel of John written? The Gospel of John tells us why it was written: John wants us to believe and have life: At the end of chapter 20, John says that he could have written many more things about Jesus. “But these are written so that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31, NRSV). Around AD 324, Eusebius, the bishop of Caesarea, tried to summarize everything he could find about the origins of the Gospels. In his Ecclesial History , he quotes from a document written by an earlier bishop, Clement of Alexandria (AD 150-215), that we no longer have: John tells about events before John the Baptist was arrested that are not in the other Gospels: Clement said that John wrote his Gospel partly because the first 3 Gospels did not tell about the beginning of Jesus’s ministry but only covered the final year of Jesus’s ministry after John the Baptist was arrested (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Book III , Chapter 24, pars. 7-8). Eusebius reports: “John accordingly, in his Gospel, records the deeds of Christ which were performed before the Baptist was cast into prison, but the other three evangelists mention the events which happened after that time” (par. 12). John wrote a “spiritual gospel”: Eusebius writes: “But, last of all, John, perceiving that the external facts had been made plain in the Gospel, being urged by his friends, and inspired by the Spirit, composed a spiritual Gospel. This is the account of Clement.” (Eusebius, Book VI , Chapter 14, pars. 6-7) This suggests that John is going beyond the external, physical, material facts and exploring the meaning of what Jesus did He is exploring on a deeper level than the other Gospels, not just providing strictly what Jesus said and did. We might call this the “theological” Gospel, because it focuses on the symbolic nature of Jesus’s life and the metaphors that help us understand the true nature of Jesus. We can see this in the ways John talks about Jesus being the light, the way, the truth, the life, the resurrection, the good shepherd, etc. How important are metaphors like the light, the way, the truth, the life, etc. in understanding who Jesus is? How do you think this Gospel might help you believe in Jesus and have life? Who is the author? We are not sure of the identity of the author of the Gospel of John. None of the Gospel authors put their name on their Gospel. The titles that say they are “according to Matthew,” “according to Mark,” etc., were added early on and are not part of the original documents. There are two puzzles regarding the authorship of the Gospel of John: John’s Gospel never refers to “John,” but it does talk about “the disciple whom Jesus loved,” who scholars call the “Beloved Disciple.” Was this Beloved Disciple the same as John the apostle, or someone else? John the apostle and his brother James were the sons of Zebedee. This Gospel never refers to James or John by name, and it only refers to the sons of Zebedee once: in an epilogue (chapter 21) not written by the author of the rest of the book. Many scholars believe that the Beloved Disciple was the apostle John, the son of Zebedee. A smaller number of scholars think it was Lazarus or Thomas. A significant group of scholars think it was another disciple not named in the other Gospels: an eyewitness who was there through it all but was not one of the “Twelve” and only rose to prominence later. The simplest conclusion is that “the one whom Jesus loved” is the apostle John, the son of Zebedee. The Beloved Disciple appears in many places where we might expect John the apostle. He reclines at Jesus’s side at the last Supper (13:21-26). He is treated as a leader (20:1-2). He is at the foot of the cross and took Mary into his house (19:25-27). And he is the disciple who it is suggested would not be martyred as Peter was (21:17-24). These are all things that fit John the Apostle. So concluding that it was John the apostle requires the fewest additional assumptions, even though many scholars prefer the idea that it was an unknown eyewitness. Who wrote the Gospel of John? Was it the eyewitness Beloved Disciple/John the apostle, or was it another person from John’s community drawing on John’s oral accounts? Irenaeus, writing around AD 180, says: “John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia” ( Irenaeus , par. 1). Eusebius, reporting what Clement had written, says that “the apostle John . . . gave in his Gospel an account of the period which had been omitted by the earlier evangelists” (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Book III , Chapter 24, par. 11). The belief that John the apostle provided the Gospel of John has a long history, and it is likely that he was the source of the eyewitness testimony (unless the scholars who think the Beloved Disciple was another, anonymous disciple are right). But that may not tell us who actually put pen to papyrus (or parchment). Several other facts complicate the question of who wrote the Gospel of John: Chapter 21 of John’s Gospel is clearly an epilogue added by someone else. Chapter 20 has a clear ending in verses 30-31. Chapter 21 tells several stories, including the story of the conversation about whether Peter and the disciple whom Jesus loved would be martyred. It tells us that the story came from the beloved disciple, and “we know that his testimony is true” (21:24). The use of the word “we” indicates that some or all of chapter 21 was added by a group. Scholars talk a lot about the “Johannine community” – the community of which John was a central member in Ephesus. There was another John – John the “presbyter” or “elder” – who was also a highly respected member of the community at Ephesus. Some scholars, going all the way back to the time of Eusebius, have thought that John the Elder wrote the Book of Revelation; some also think he wrote, or at least compiled the final version of, the Gospel of John. All of the Gospels were developed through a process as they transitioned from oral stories to written accounts that compiled those stories. None of the Gospels appeared from out of nowhere. The stories were first told orally. Then, someone wrote them down. It appears that the 4 Gospels have material that was gathered from a variety of sources – probably mostly oral sources, though there also may have been written documents that were partial Gospels or collections of sayings or stories. So even if John the Apostle was the primary source for this material, it might have gone through stages, including possibly more than one written stage, before it arrived at the final version we have. Many scholars today think that the Gospel of John was the work of several people in the Johannine community. They think there was an original “John” who was an eyewitness; that there was an “evangelist” who first wrote a Gospel that built on what the original eyewitness reported; and that a redactor put it into its final form. Some think that there was a version written in Aramaic before the first version in Greek, but others find no evidence for that. We will call the author “John,” but whether it was John the apostle or an unnamed disciple whom Jesus loved doesn’t chang the outcome. What matters is that at its root, it came from an eyewitness, and the result – the Gospel we have today – was inspired by God. Where did the author of the Gospel of John get his material? The original source was an eyewitness. The Gospel shows great familiarity with Palestinian geography (for example, Solomon’s portico in the Temple area; the pavement called Gabbatha where Pilate decided Jesus’s fate; that there were 2 towns called Bethany; the pool of Siloam, which was only rediscovered in 2005; the pool of Bethesda with its 5 porticos, rediscovered in the 1800s; etc.); the details of Jesus’s trial and crucifixion (that 4 soldiers gambled for Jesus’s robe; the blood and water that poured from his side; the weight of the myrrhs and aloes used to anoint his body; etc.), and many other details (that the boy with the loaves and fishes had barley loaves; that they had rowed 3 or 4 miles before Jesus came walking to them on the water; that Judas objected that the perfumed oil used to anoint Jesus’s feet could have been sold for 300 days’ wages; quotes of statements made by Thomas; etc.). This original eyewitness had a unique perspective, separate from the other Gospel authors. Most of the material in the Gospel of John is different from what is in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) – not contradictory (except in one significant place), just different. There is some overlap with Mark, but that could just relate to the fact that different eyewitnesses saw the same events. Some of the material in the Gospel of John appears to come from the reflection of the Johannine community and not necessarily all from the mouth of Jesus while he walked the Earth. That would be consistent with the idea that John’s is a “spiritual gospel” that presents more of an interpretation or analysis of who Jesus is, not just what he did and said. The Johannine community appears to have placed a strong emphasis on the role of the Holy Spirit (the Paraclete), so some of the material may not have come directly from Jesus but from later revelations the Johannine community received that they believed were revealed to them by Jesus through the Holy Spirit. So, for example, in John 3:16-21, did Jesus say, “For God so loved the world that he sent his only son,” or is that an explanation by John? The Greek of that time did not use quotation marks, so we don’t know whether it is a quote or an explanation. But maybe it doesn’t matter, because either way, we believe it is part of the inspired Word of God. To what extent does it matter to you whether the Gospel of John was written by John the apostle or another eyewitness? To what extent does it matter to you whether the final version reflects a process of editing and refinement by other writers in the Christian community, or not? Do these questions affect whether the result that we have today is the Word of God? Explain. When was the Gospel written? Most scholars think the Gospel of John was written in the AD 90s, but a small case could be made that it was written before AD 70. John does not offer many textual clues for when it was written. Scholars think Matthew was written after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in AD 70 in part because Matthew’s Gospel makes some statements that sound like the author knew that it had happened. John does not give us that kind of clue. There is one spot where John uses a phrase that could indicate that it was written before AD 70. John 5:2 says, “Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate a pool....” It would be odd for John to use the word “is” if he knew that the city had been destroyed and the pool was no longer there. However, the Gospel could merely be relating the story as it would have been told orally and handed down for decades, so a single “is” is not much evidence to base a conclusion on. John presents what is called a “high Christology” – a high view of Jesus’s identity as God. Many scholars believe that it took time for the understanding to develop that Jesus was not just the Messiah/Christ but God in the flesh. That argues for a later date. The latest it could have been written was the early 100s. For a while, some scholars argued that John’ Gospel wasn’t written until as late as 150 or later. That idea was shot down when a fragment of papyrus was discovered in Egypt that contains a few verses from chapter 18 of John’s Gospel and that is considered to be dated between 100 and 150. Since it would have taken some time for that copy of the Gospel to have reached Africa, John was probably published no later than the early 100s ( Ignatius Catholic Study Bible , p. 157; Bruce, pp. 6-7). On a separate note, people sometimes wonder whether the Gospels might have been doctored or rewritten over the centuries by people or factions who had agendas of one kind or another – for example, after the time of Constantine when Christianity became the state religion. The facts don’t support such a theory: We have a papyrus dating from the end of the 2 nd century (the late 100s, only 100 years after the Gospel of John was probably written) that contains most of the first 14 chapters of John’s Gospel and parts of the rest. Another papyrus from the end of the 2nd century contains most of Luke and the first half of John. We also have a papyrus from the early 3 rd century (100 years before Constantine made Christianity the religion of the Roman Empire) that contains portions of all 4 Gospels and Acts of the Apostles (Bruce, pp. 6-7). The Gospels we have today are not hugely different from what the Church had in the 2 nd and early 3 rd centuries. Where was the Gospel written? There is widespread agreement that the Gospel of John was written in Ephesus. There is a large amount of evidence that John lived in Ephesus for much of his later life, with Jesus’s mother Mary. What do we know about John’s audience and community? Many scholars have written whole books presenting their theories about the Johannine community. These scholars try to read between the lines of John’s Gospel and compare it to what we know or think we might know about what was going on the Church at that time, to extrapolate what we might conclude about John’s community. The most important points are these: Many scholars think that John’s Gospel was written mainly for Jews and Jewish Christians, though not all agree. Although it does not quote the Old Testament as frequently as other Gospels, John’s Gospel would be nearly unintelligible to people who lack an understanding of Jewish traditions and concepts. For example, this is the Gospel with all the “I am” statements that echo God’s name for himself in the Old Testament. Non-Jews would tend to miss the import of those statements. John also focuses on Jesus’s attendance at Jewish feast days in Jerusalem, without bothering to explain them. John’s community appears to have faced intense opposition from Jews who did not believe in Jesus. Those Jews kicked Jewish Christians out of the synagogues. When John speaks negatively of “the Jews,” modern people tend to wonder why, since John was a Jew. He is talking about the leaders of the non-Christian Jews who persecuted Christians. It might be like a White person speaking negatively about “the Whites” who persecuted Black people in the South for 100 years after the Civil War. He doesn’t mean all Jews, just those who rejected Jesus and mistreated Christians. Many scholars think John’s community may have included Samaritans who converted to Christianity. They reach this conclusion because of John’s inclusion of the story of the Samaritan woman and the conversion of her town in John 4 and the lack of any negative references to Samaritans in his Gospel (Matthew and Luke each have one or more negative references to Samaritans). The idea would be that John originally gathered converts in Palestine, Samaritan converts joined him, and they all eventually moved to Ephesus because of Jewish opposition in Palestine. If indeed John’s community included Samaritans, that could have precipitated even more Jewish persecution since there was a longstanding hatred of Samaritans in the Jewish community. John’s community may have had a special emphasis on the Holy Spirit. John’s Gospel has much more material on the Holy Spirit than the other Gospels do. John’s community may have had frequent theological disagreements with other Christians and may eventually have had a split inside their own community. Scholars think the Johannine community was critical of what scholars call “crypto-Christians” – Jewish Christians who downplayed their Christian faith in order to remain in the synagogues. They see hints in his Gospel that he may have had disagreements with Christians who did not share his high Christology or who did not place such a high emphasis on the ongoing role of the Holy Spirit. And the New Testament letter 1 John, which might have been written as few as 10 years after the Gospel of John, indicates that the Johannine community eventually faced a serious internal disagreement that led to a painful split in which some Christians in the community left. In what ways do you think the experiences and difficulties the early Church faced might have shaped what the Gospels writers decided to include or not bother to include in their Gospels? Themes in the Gospel of John The Gospel of John is marked by a series of 7 “signs” – wondrous deeds Jesus does that demonstrate his authority – beginning with his turning water into wine at the wedding feast at Cana (2:1-11). The first chapter of John provides a first mention of many themes that will recur later in the Gospel. These themes include: Jesus is the Son of God the Father. Jesus is one with the Father and existed before he was born as a human. Jesus reveals the Father. Some people do not know the Father because they refuse to accept Jesus. Jesus’s followers are children of God. Jesus brings life. Jesus brings light. Jesus brings the truth. Many people and events provide testify that Jesus is who he says he is. John develops additional themes as the Gospel progresses , include these: There is a Third Person of the Triune God, the Spirit, who will be with Jesus’s followers when Jesus returns to heaven. Jesus is the Bread of Life. Jesus will be “lifted up” to bring people to himself. God loves the world and shows his love in Jesus’s sacrifice of himself. Jesus’s disciples are called to follow him, obey him, and love one another. Which of these themes of John’s Gospel intrigue you the most, and why? What do you hope to learn by studying John’s Gospel? What questions do you hope to have answered as you study? If you could ask John one question, what would you ask, and why? How do you think he would respond? Take a step back and consider this: Atheists criticize belief in the Gospels because they have such different perspectives, which they call contradictions. If God inspired them all, how could the authors have such different versions of the story? The differences do not trouble me. In fact, if the Gospels were all perfectly aligned, I would be more skeptical. If every book told the story in exactly the same way, it would make me wonder if some person or group doctored or coordinated all the writings. I can’t imagine that a genuine set of Scriptures could be any other way than our Scriptures are: different in tiny details because of the humanness of the human authors and how they obtained and crafted their material. The only way the accounts could be entirely identical and still genuine is if God turned the original authors into robots taking dictation from him, and that would go directly against what it means to be a human made in the image of God with freedom, a unique personality, unique experiences, and unique ways of telling what we know to be the truth. Not everyone has such confidence in God: to believe that he could work through humans to develop a collection of books and letters that are inspired by him and have sacred and eternal value even though they were written by human authors working with their various perspectives and limitations. But that is why we say God is the author of the sacred Scriptures even as humans were the authors of the various books. God, in his awesomeness, honored human freedom even as he guided the result. What does the fact that God used such different people to produce the 4 Gospels tell you about God’s confidence in working through human beings to achieve his purposes? How can that give you greater confidence that God can work through you? Bibliography See John - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/john/bibliography . Copyright © 2026, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous John List Next

Faith Explored offers resources for anyone interested in exploring how to apply God’s Word to our lives today.  The website was launched by Tom Faletti to bring to a wider audience the study materials he has developed in more than 40 years of small-group Bible Study. Please check out our blog Our website host is no longer supporting a forum. Jump to the Blog Page Blog Page Please review our Comment Policy to make sure your comments are appropriate. ! Image at top provided by Wix. Join Faith Explored and Join the Conversation! Members of Faith Explored can comment on our blog posts, post comments in the forums, and post their own questions. C lick here or the blue button below to join (it's free). Use the other buttons below to post a comment. Become a Member to Enable Comments Blog Page Forum Page

What is the small gesture or action you could take? Previous Christian Faith Articles Next Reconciliation Can Start with a Gesture What is the small gesture or action you could take? Image provided by Wix. Tom Faletti February 24, 2024 It is sometimes hard to reconcile with someone who has hurt you, or whom you have hurt. We may think the gulf lying between us is too great. We know that the Bible tells us to forgive each other (Eph. 4:32; Matt. 5:23-24; Matt. 6:14-15; Col. 3:13). In Philippians 4:2, Paul asks the believers in Philippi to help two women leaders in the local church to be reconciled to each other. But how do we do it? It can be hard to know how to even take the first step. Sometimes, it all begins with a gesture of good will. The Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Church have been separated since the 16 th century. Many people of good will on both sides desired at least a thaw in relations, if not a formal reconciliation, but the rift seemed unbridgeable. After the Roman Catholic Church’s Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, the Catholic Church embraced a new openness to dialogue. On March 24, 1966, Pope Paul VI and the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, Michael Ramsey, met in Rome in the basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls. At that meeting, they signed a declaration in which they agreed to pursue a serious dialogue with each other. Perhaps more significant than the declaration was a gesture that Pope Paul VI made during their meeting. Here is how Gerald O’Connell of America magazine describes it: Paul VI took the ring off his finger and placed it on Archbishop Ramsey’s finger. The archbishop burst into tears because he understood that the bishop of Rome was, in a symbolic rather than doctrinal way, recognizing his role as archbishop and inviting a deep relationship toward full visible unity. Ever since, the archbishops of Canterbury have worn that ring when they visit the pope. ( A short history of Catholic-Anglican relations—and the last roadblocks to unity ) Pope Paul VI offered Archbishop Ramsey a ring. And he made it personal by placing the ring on the Archbishop’s finger. This simple gesture did nothing to break through the doctrinal disagreements between the churches. But it did everything to start the dialogue. The lesson is clear for us. We don’t have to achieve a full reconciliation in one step. The question is, can we take a first step? In our normal lives, I can’t imagine a situation where offering a ring would be a helpful gesture. But each ruptured relationship is unique. For one, it might be a token or gesture, for another it might be a note or small act of kindness. But our God is the God of reconciliation, so we can trust him that something can break through the cold silence and start the thawing process. What is the small gesture or action you could take with someone you are estranged from, to start the process toward a possible reconciliation? Copyright © 2024, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Christian Faith Articles Next

What are the “talents” God has given to you, and are you using them fruitfully? Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 25:14-30 What are the “talents” God has given to you, and are you using them fruitfully? Parable of the Talents . Courtesy of Lumo Project Films – www.lumoproject.com , distributed exclusively by Bible Media Group under a license for FreeBibleimages, https://www.freebibleimages.org/photos/lumo-parable-talents/ . Tom Faletti September 14, 2025 Matthew 25:14-30 The parable of the talents (silver pieces) This parable seems unrelated to the previous parables about being ready, but it is not unrelated. Jesus begins this story with the words: “For it is as if . . .” (NRSV) or “It will be as when . . .” (NABRE). What is the “it” to which he is comparing this story? The “it” is what he has just been talking about – the day when the Son of Man returns. A man wealthy enough to have slaves or servants is going on a journey. What does he do before he leaves? The Greek word “talent” was originally used to describe a certain amount of weight, and then it developed a meaning as an amount of money when rulers made “coins” of gold or silver weighing that much. A talent was huge – usually at least 60 pounds (or 27 kilograms) and often more, depending on where and when it was used. The value of a single silver talent was roughly equal to the value of 6,000 days’ wages for a common laborer or soldier, so it was worth what a laborer could earn in almost 20 years of work. The first man receives 5 talents. In today’s dollars, in the United States that would be worth somewhere between $1.4 million and $3 million (as of 2025, considering the minimum wage in various jurisdictions). The second man receives 2 talents, which would be worth between $550,000 and $1.2 million. The third man receives one talent, the equivalent of between $275,000 and $600,000. Them man is giving them large amounts of money. What do you think the man expects his servants to do with the money he gives them? In a parable, the different elements of the story stand for different things. In this story, the master stands for who? The servants stand for who? After a long while, the master returns. It is this delay and eventual return that links this parable to the two preceding parables about being ready. How does this parable relate to the previous parables? What does Jesus expect us to be doing while we wait and remain prepared for his return? Throughout Christian history, Christians have seen an additional point in this parable. For each of us, what does the day of accounting stand for, when the master comes and settles accounts with the servants? This parable illustrates the day when we come before God in judgment – perhaps at the end of the world as we know it but certainly at the end of our lives when we die. There will be an accounting of our lives. A “talent” is literally a huge, block of silver weighing 60 pounds or more, but Jesus is speaking metaphorically about more than just money. What do the “talents” stand for? What are the things God has given us that he expects us to put to good use? Our skills and abilities, our money, our time, our character traits, our family background, our education and knowledge, our creativity, our social skills – the list can go on and on. Anything God has given to you is something for which you should expect God to eventually ask you to give an accounting of what you did with it. Interestingly, the English word “talent,” which means an ability, came from the Greek word in this parable, as the parable was interpreted in terms of people’s abilities. Notice that the man gives the servants different amounts of talents, according to their abilities (25:15). What does this tell you about God’s work among us in our lives? When our translations of the Bible fail to translate the value of a talent into our language, we tend to think it is talking about something small: we might think that 5 talents is like 5 small coins. But Jesus is implying that the “talents” God has given to us are of great value – like a million dollars in money or a large amount for other kinds of talents. Jesus is implying that God has given different people huge or valuable abilities in different areas. You are like a millionaire in some aspects of your life. Not necessarily in money, but you are at the million level in some ability or resource, or in some character trait, or in the family background you grew up in, or in your education or knowledge, or your creativity, or your social skills or empathy, or your organizational or managerial skills, or in whatever your special gifts are. Jesus is saying that God has given you a lot of something that can be used for his purposes! How does that make you feel? What are some of the things God has endowed you with that you can use to “make more”? When he tells you to “make more” with what you have been given, what does “more” mean? What does it look like in your particular case? When you use what God has given to you, what is the more that you can make with your gifts from God? If you are exploring this passage with a small group and you know each other, you can try to answer this: What are some of the ways you see other members of your group using what God has given to them to make good things happen that might not happen without them? In verse 21, the master says, “Well done.” How do you think that makes the servant feel? How would it feel to you to have God say that to you? In verse 21, the productive servant gets three affirmations from Jesus. Find each one. How does the master describe the servant’s character ? What does the master say the servant will receive ? What does the master say the servant will enjoy ? He receives praise for being “good” and either “trustworthy” (NRSV) or “faithful” (NABRE). He will receive more opportunities to serve God. And he is invited to share in his master’s joy. How do these rewards apply to us? The good servants receive three rewards: praise from God, more opportunities to serve God, and the chance to enter into the joy of God. Is there one of these rewards that you would find particularly satisfying at the end of your life? Which one do you especially look forward to? Note that the second servant receives the same three rewards as the second servant. What does this tell us about people with only mid-level abilities? People with mid-level talents receive the same rewards. God just asks for your best with what you have been given, whatever that is. When the master returns, why does the third servant have only what he was originally given? Why does the master castigate him? The third servant may represent the person who legitimately has less talent or opportunity. What do you think the master hoped that servant would do with his smaller amount of talent? The third servant fears the master. He does not have the kind of relationship with the master that makes him comfortable taking a risk to do something with what the master has given to him. Are there times when fear might hold you back from using what you have been given? Explain. What does the master do in response to the third servant’s failure to do anything with what he has been given? How does the master describe the third servant in verses 26 and 30? The master calls him wicked, lazy, and either “worthless” (NRSV) or “useless” (NABRE). The master’s response indicates that God expects something from us. What does God expect from us? What does the fact that different servants receive different amounts of talents say to us today? What does this passage say to you about your own life? Is there something you need to give more attention to? If so, what? How would you like to respond to this parable? Take a step back and consider this: Sometimes people have talents that are hidden – maybe that people aren’t even aware of – until someone else calls them forth by speaking a word of encouragement, by naming a talent that has previously not been noticed, by recognizing what others have missed, or by providing an opportunity for leadership or service. The people who call forth others’ gifts – the “encouragers” – play a valuable role in our lives and a crucial role in the kingdom of God. They help people become more fully what they were meant to be. Who has encouraged you to use your talents? What are some of the things “encouragers” do that draw forth other people’s talents? What would you say is the key to being the kind of person about whom others say, “They are always so encouraging. I had the courage to use my gifts because of them”? How can you be an encourager in your everyday life? How can you, by your words and actions, encourage others to use their talents more fully and effectively? Who is someone you can be more encouraging for, right now in your life? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

That's one of our goals. Previous Next Table of Contents To Have the Mind of Christ That's one of our goals. Tom Faletti March 6, 2024 Some people think of religion as being like the relationship between a master and a slave: God orders and I obey. This attracts some people and repels others. They are both missing something central to our faith. People from both perspectives are missing something because they think that the Christian faith asks us to turn off our minds and just “believe.” That’s not the faith of the gospel. St. Paul says, “Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 2:5-11, NRSV). How can I think of my mind as something to turn off, if I am urged to have the same mind as Christ. I have to think carefully in order to think like Christ. Paul also says, “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God – what is good and acceptable and perfect” (Romans 12:2, NRSV). What does God want to transform? Our minds. Why? So that we can discern well. If our minds are not valued by God, if He just wants us to turn off our minds and “have faith,” why would Paul say this? Ephesians says that we are to use our gifts to build up the body of Christ “until all of us come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to maturity, to the measure of the full stature of Christ” (Eph. 4:13, NRSV). Our goal is to reach the full stature of Christ. Did Jesus turn off his brain? No! He used it very carefully and wisely, throughout His ministry. Jesus said to his disciples, “I do not call you servants any longer, because the servant does not know what the master is doing; but I have called you friends, because I have made known to you everything that I have heard from my Father” (John 15:15, NRSV). How could we possibly make use of all the wisdom and knowledge that Jesus has received from the Father if we do not spend time thinking, but instead assume that we can “believe” and be done? So the point is that we are called to think. We are called to use these magnificent brains that we have received from God. We are called to put on the MIND – not just the heart or soul or will – of Jesus. So let’s get to work! TO BE CONTINUED Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Table of Contents Next

You provide the salt and light of Jesus to the world. Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 5:13-16 You provide the salt and light of Jesus to the world. Image provided by Wix. Tom Faletti April 21, 2024 Matthew 5:13-16 You are the salt and light of the world Salt has many useful properties. What is salt good for? In this passage, what good property of salt is Jesus focusing on (verse 13)? The Greek word for “earth” in verse 13 is the same as the word for “earth” in verse 5. It can mean soil, or a particular territory on the Earth, or the physical realm of existence (as in references to “heaven and earth”). In this case, it can’t mean “soil” since salt is not generally a good thing for soil. When Jesus says we are the salt of the “earth,” what do you think he means by “earth”? Metaphorically speaking, in what ways can Christians be the kind of good “salt” that flavors the world around us or improves the taste of life? Jesus says that salt that has lost its flavor is thrown out because it is not good for anything. Since he is talking metaphorically about Christians, what is he saying about such Christians? What do you need to do to keep being good salt in the world around you? What adjustments in your Christian life might help you be the kind of person who is the kind of “salt” the world needs? In verse 14, Jesus shifts to a different metaphor: light. What does he say that we are? In what ways are we meant to be like the light of a city that is built on a hill? In this metaphor about light, what kind of light are we supposed to be shining? According to Jesus in verse 16, what will people see in us when our light is shining properly? What do you think he means when he says that when our light is shining, people will see our “good works”? What do you think he means by “good works”? What are some ways that Christians might put their light under a bushel? What are some ways that we might put our light on a lampstand? According to verse 16, why will people give glory to God when our light is shining properly? Jesus says that when our light is shining properly, they will see our good works. In our world today, many people who do not believe in Jesus do not think Christians are a light and don't see a reason to give glory to God. It would be easy to blame this entirely on them. Turn your focus toward ourselves for a minute. How might Christians be interacting with the world in ways that do not shine a light – that are not seen as good works? What can we do to be better lights in the world? Take a step back and consider this: Sometimes we assume that if non-Christians fail to see the light of Christ, it is because of their own obstinacy. But we know that we are not perfect, so surely there are also times when the fault lies with how we are living out our faith or how we are representing Jesus to the world. There is no light where there is no truth. But sometimes we obscure the truth by pretending that things are simpler than they are. When Christians claim that following Jesus is simple – “all you have to do is have faith” – people think we are saying that if they just believe, all their problems will go away. They know that is not true, since Christians also have problems, so that message obscures the light. Many young people find it hard to see the light of Christ in us because of the inadequate attention many of our churches give to the injustices that weigh heavily on the hearts of young people (and people of every age who hear the cry of oppressed peoples for justice). When Christians uncritically support one political approach even though every political organization focuses on only some of God’s concerns for justice, or fail to address flaws in the churches themselves, people whose hearts cry for justice find it hard to see us as salt or light. Our light can also be obscured by our lack of holiness. If we only honor some of God’s commands, if we look like we mainly care about ourselves and people like us, if we fail to be engaged consistently in good works as our Lord told us to, then we should not be surprised that the world does not see us as salt and light. Think about a time when you were not the kind of salt or light that effectively represented Jesus to the world. What went wrong? Think about a time when you were particularly effective at being the kind of salt or light that Jesus calls us to be. What happened that allowed you to be salt or light? How can you build habits that will allow the salt and light of Jesus to be communicated to the world around you more consistently? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

At FaithExplored.com we want our comment section and forums to be places where there is thoughtful and respectful conversation that helps us explore how to apply God’s Word to our lives today. We want a welcoming environment where the objective is to seek truth, not to score points or win victories. Comment Policy In our comment section and forums, we expect thoughtful and respectful conversation that helps us explore how to apply God’s Word to our lives today. We want a welcoming environment where the objective is to seek truth, not to score points or win victories. To help support these goals, we expect the following from all participants: Keep your comments respectful and kind. The following are never acceptable: profanity, personal attacks, insults, insinuations, degrading comments, self-promotion, baiting, bullying, or any other forms of disrespect. Discuss the specific post or article at hand. Posts that support an off-topic, commercial, or other purpose that does not support the goals of this website are not allowed. Be brief and stay on topic. Proofread what you wrote before you submit it. ("Write not so that you can be understood, but so that you cannot be misunderstood.") Listen to and to respond to each other; don’t just get on your own soapbox. Acknowledge other people’s thoughtful points, even if you reach different conclusions. Posts will be actively moderated to facilitate a thoughtful and respectful conversation. Any comments that do not support these goals may be removed, and posters who disregard these rules may be blocked from further posting.

Are you wearing spiritual clothes fit for life in the kingdom of heaven? Previous Matthew List Next Matthew 22:1-14 Are you wearing spiritual clothes fit for life in the kingdom of heaven? Francisco Goya (1746–1828). La parábola de los convidados a la boda [The parable of the wedding guests] . Circa 1796-97. Oratory (Chapel) of the Santa Cueva (Holy Cave), Cádiz, Spain. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_par%C3%A1bola_de_los_convidados_a_la_boda_por_Goya.jpg . Tom Faletti August 9, 2025 Matthew 22:1-14 The parable of the guests at the wedding feast Read only Matthew 22:1-10 first . Verses 11-14 are an extension of the story with a separate point. What happens in this parable? Note: Luke tells a somewhat different version of this parable (Luke 14:15-24) where it is just a banquet not a wedding feast, and none of the king’s servants are mistreated or killed. Also, Matthew adds an entirely separate addition to the story that we will look at shortly (vv. 11-14). Some scholars suggest that Matthew tailored the story to the particular needs of his community and the particular point he wanted to make here. It is also possible that Jesus told this story more than once and in this instance told it in a way that connected with the point he made in the preceding parable about the wicked tenants. The image of a feast is a common way of thinking about what heaven might be like, and Jesus says that this is a parable about the kingdom of heaven. Why is a banquet of feast a particularly good image of heaven? Note: The Greek word translated “slaves” or “servants” in this parable is doulos . This word generally means “slaves.” It is often translated “servants” because, although slavery in the Roman Empire often was brutal, slaves often had much more freedom than we envision when we think of American, plantation-based, race-based, segregationist slavery. In the Roman Empire, slaves often did the same jobs as free people, side by side with free people. They could receive wages and in some cases were able to buy their own freedom. To avoid giving the wrong impression, a majority of English translations from the King James Bible to the present have used the word “servant.” Who do the different players of the story represent in the kingdom of heaven – who is: the king? the son? the invited guests? the first group of servants/slaves (who are ignored/rebuffed)? the second group of servants/slaves (who are mistreated/killed)? the third group of servants/slaves who go invite people in the streets? the people “bad and good” who are found on the streets and invited? The parable is generally interpreted as referring to these people: God the Father, Jesus the Son of God, the people of Israel (the Jews), the prophets, more prophets and perhaps John the Baptist (and Jesus also might fit here in the sense that he was inviting the people of Israel to enter the kingdom of God), the apostles/early Church, and the Gentiles. The king is excited to have his invited guests come to the wedding banquet. What does this tell us about God? God wants to share his presence and joy with humans. He wants us to be with him. He’s persistent. Why would this particular kind of feast – a marriage feast for the son – be an especially appropriate image of heaven? How do the invited guests react? Notice that some of the invited guests just dismiss the invitation and go about their business, but other invited guests mistreat and kill the servants. Who do the people who kill the servants represent? The Jewish leaders, past and present. How might people in our day be like the ones who ignore the invitation because they are too busy? Is there a danger that even people who are members of the Church might be like these people who are “too busy” to spend time with God? What in your life might sometimes seem so important that you might miss out on joining in the Lord’s banquet celebration? Are there ways that we allow even mundane matters to distract us so that we don’t participate in the joy of spending more time with God? In verse 7, the king destroys the murderers who killed his servants and burns their city. Many scholars think that Matthew is alluding to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70, and that is one of the reasons they think that the Gospel of Matthew was written after AD 70. Luke does not have this verse, which might be support the idea that Matthew added it to the original story. When the New Testament was written, there was no such thing as quotation marks in writing, so Matthew would not have had any way to signal that he was adding a note of commentary or interpretation. In verse 7, which is not in Luke’s version of the parable, it sounds like Matthew is suggesting that God destroyed Jerusalem because Jesus was killed there. Some people are troubled by that image of God, because it seems to suggest that God is a vengeful god (“you killed my son, so I’m going to kill you”) rather than a loving God. What do you make of this verse? The king still wants guests. He still has a banquet prepared and a banquet is no good without guests, so what does he do? Who do these new guests represent in the kingdom of heaven? In the immediate telling of the parable, they represent tax collectors, prostitutes, and other “sinners” who repent. By the time of Matthew, they also represent the Gentiles, who were a significant part of Matthew’s community. In our time, they represent us. The king then tells the servants/slaves to invite anyone they can find, “bad and good.” Why does God invite even the “bad” to come spend time with him in his banquet? Being there can start a change. God is inviting us to come to him even when we are not perfect, because he wants us to be with him and grow to be like him. How does this inclusion of the bad and the good describe the Church (i.e., Christians as a whole) throughout history and in our day? What does this welcoming of the bad and the good tell us about God? How does this part of the story illustrate the meaning of “grace”? What is the message Jesus is trying to get across to the Jewish leaders? What is the message for us? Now let’s look at the additional section Matthew adds that is not in Luke’s story. It is like an additional parable added on to the earlier parable. Read Matthew 22:11-14 . What happens? People are sometimes uncomfortable with the idea that people who were invited in off the streets could be criticized for not wearing the proper clothes. This would miss the point. Scholars suggest that we might picture it this way: The guests might have been provided wedding robes by the king, or the invitation might have named a specific time that gave them time to go home and put on the proper attire for the wedding banquet. It was the norm at the time for a king to send out invitations in advance to let people know that they were going to be invited to a feast and then send out a second notice when it was time to come. So we shouldn’t take this part of the parable too literally. Instead, we should ask: This is a parable about the kingdom of heaven. What are the proper “garments” to wear in the kingdom of heaven? What should we clothe ourselves with? Read Colossians 3:12-14 . What does Paul tell us to clothe ourselves with? In Colossians 3:12-14, he tells us to put on compassion, kindness, humbleness, gentleness, patience, forbearance, forgiveness, and love. In other words, live a life fitting for being at the banquet of the Lord. God is inviting us to put on those garments, which are his garments. In Romans 13:14, Paul tells us to put on the Lord Jesus Christ and make no provision for our sin-based desires. Returning to Matthew, who does the guest who is not properly dressed stand for? This guest might represent people who respond to God at a surface level but don’t actually let him transform them. They do not show any recognition of the relationship with God (the king) that they have been invited to embrace. How might we be guilty of not fully putting on the metaphorical “garments” that are fitting for living with God now and forever in the kingdom of heaven? Does it make sense to you that God would invite everyone, good and bad, including us, into a relationship with him, but expect us to respond by putting on the proper “attire” for being at his heavenly banquet? Some scholars like the idea that God supplies the proper garments to us – he doesn’t expect us to be holy on our own. How does that image reflect your relationship with God? In Revelation 7:13-15, the ones who are wearing white robes are those who have washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb. In 19:6-8, at the wedding feast of the Lamb, his bride, the Church, is wearing a bright clean garment made out of “the righteous deeds of the saints.” Read Matthew 7:21-23 . What would Matthew say is necessary to be clothed properly for the kingdom of heaven? We need to do the will of God. In Matthew 22:14, many translations say, “many are called,” but the verb in that phrase has the same root as the word “invited” in the parable. When Jesus in Matthew 22:14 that “many are invited but few are chosen,” what does that tell us? The invitation to be part of God’s kingdom goes out far and wide, and everyone is given a chance to come to God’s heavenly banquet. But not everyone does their part. Jesus is not saying that God is selectively allowing only a few people into heaven. In the contrary, he is saying that some people don’t choose to do what is necessary to belong there. What do you need to do to be properly “clothed” for God’s great banquet feast in heaven? Take a step back and consider this: Regardless of whether the king provides the wedding robes to the guests or they are given time to get properly dressed before they come, one thing stands out: The man at the end of the story is not properly clothed. When the king points this out, the man is unable to offer any argument or defense. He is not dressed properly to be celebrating with the king at the heavenly banquet. To what extent do we have a choice as to what “garments” we put on as we participate in the kingdom of God? How do we “choose” our garments? How can you, by the choices you make, embrace a life that puts on the love and compassion of Jesus? Bibliography See Matthew - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/matthew/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Matthew List Next

Mary watches Jesus grow up and begin his ministry. After she brings a concern to him, she tells others, “Do whatever he tells you.” Those are wise words for us. What would he tell you about your concerns? [Luke 2:40-52; Matthew 3:13; 4:1; 4:12-13; 4:18-22; John 2:1-12] Previous Mary List Next Session 4: "Do whatever he tells you." Mary watches Jesus grow up and begin his ministry. After she brings a concern to him, she tells others, “Do whatever he tells you.” Those are wise words for us. What would he tell you about your concerns do? [Luke 2:40-52; Matthew 3:13; 4:1; 4:12-13; 4:18-22; John 2:1-12] Cornelis Engebrechtsz (ca. 1462 - 1527). Jesus Says Farewell to Mary . Circa 1515 - circa 1520. Cropped. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jezus_neemt_afscheid_van_Maria_Rijksmuseum_SK-A-1719.jpeg . Tom Faletti July 14, 2025 Luke 2:40-52 Jesus at the age of 12 in the Temple Read Luke 2:40. Luke is describing the child Jesus as he grows up. What do you think Mary is doing during this time? She is feeding him, changing his diaper, teaching him words, nurturing him with tender caresses and kisses, teaching him chores, teaching him the moral law of right and wrong, singing psalms and hymns, praying with him, including him in the many rituals and ceremonies and prayers that made up a Jewish life of faith, cooking, cleaning, talking with him about the people around him and all the things a mother talks to her son about – both consequential and mundane, and the list goes on. She is also watching, pondering and treasuring, praying for him, etc. Look at how verse 52 describes Jesus’s development. What was Mary’s role in his growth in wisdom and grace (or favor) in the eyes of God and people? How can we help the young people around us to grow in wisdom and grace as we watch them grow? Considering the early threats to Jesus’s life, Mary and Joseph might have decided to keep him secluded in Galilee. Yet verse 41 tells us that they went to the capital city Jerusalem every year, presumably taking Jesus with them. Would you have brought Jesus to Jerusalem regularly or tried to keep him far away? What do Mary’s annual trips to Jerusalem tell you about her? What happens to Jesus on the Passover trip when he is 12? As they were journeying back to Galilee, why do you think it took Mary and Joseph a full day to realize that Jesus was missing and not caravan of people heading home? Were they neglectful? Does it tell us something about his maturity and their trust in him? How do you think this could have happened? How do you think Mary feels when she realizes he is not in the caravan with them as they head home? When they return to Jerusalem, they search for him for THREE days – presumably with Mary growing increasingly anxious as they look and look and look without finding him. How do you think she handled her anxiety? Do you ever feel like you are losing track of Jesus in your life? If so, how might Mary’s way of dealing with the missing Jesus be instructive? She retraces her steps, going back to where she last saw him. How might that be useful in your own spiritual life? Sometimes, the best thing to do is, like Mary, to go back to the habits, patterns, and practices that nurtured your relationship with him previously. When they find Jesus, Mary’s question to Jesus is, “Why have you done this to us?” (Luke 2:48), which implies that she thinks he knew he was making them anxious. Do you think he knew he was making them feel so anxious? If so, why do you think Jesus did what he did even though it would cause his parents so much anxiety? Jesus doesn’t answer with an “I’m sorry.” His answer in verse 49 is not comforting at all. What does he say, and what does it suggest about his growing sense of his relationship with Mary and Joseph? How do you think Mary felt about his answer in verse 49? Verse 51 tells us that when they returned to Nazareth, Jesus “was obedient to them.” He didn’t become a bratty or disobedient teenager. Why do you think Jesus, who was God, was obedient to them, who were just humans? How do you think Mary felt about the teenage Jesus? Verse 51 also tells us that Mary “treasured” or “kept” all these things in her heart, echoing verse 19 after the visit of the shepherds to see the baby Jesus. What do you think that meant, as she lived a real life? How do you treasure or keep the things that God has done in your life? Do you also “treasure” the puzzles that you don’t fully understand yet? Would it be good to do that? Explain. Verse 52 has sometimes been interpreted to mean that Jesus grew mentally (in wisdom), physically (in age), spiritually (in the favor of God), and socially (in the favor of other people) – that is, in all the ways that we hope young people will grow over time. How does the idea that Jesus grew in all these human dimensions encourage you? Looking back at Mary’s overall handling of this traumatic incident, what can you learn from her? A footnote: People sometimes wonder if Jesus had bar mitzvah. “Bar mitzvah” means “son of commandment,” i.e., subject to the law. In modern times, it is performed at the age of 13. There is no reference to bar mitzvah in the Bible. People try to make connections to things that happened in the Bible, like Abraham sacrificing Isaac at age 12, but none of them look like the Jewish ceremony of bar mitzvah. No scholarly sources have provided evidence that bar mitzvah existed as a practice in Jesus’s time. The general consensus is that it did not originate as a ceremony until the Middle Ages, at least several hundred years after the time of Jesus. The next time Mary appears in the Bible, Jesus is an adult. Before we look at that passage, let’s read a few verses that tell us what Jesus does when he first starts moving into his public ministry. That will give us the background for the first story in his adult life where Mary is mentioned in the story. For each of the following passages, consider this question: How do you think Mary reacts to these things that Jesus does? What do you think her perspective is? (By way of background: On the one hand, he is around 30 years old (Luke 3:23). On the other hand, he is still her son and has been living with her up to this time.) Matthew 3:13 Jesus goes to his cousin John to be baptized Jesus is going away to see what his cousin John is doing at the Jordan River, so in a sense he is going to see family. However, it is a journey of more than 80 miles – further than the trip to Jerusalem. How do you think Mary feels about what Jesus is doing? Matthew 4:1 Jesus goes out into the desert and is tempted How do you think Mary feels about what Jesus is doing? Matthew 4:12-13 Jesus moves out of Nazareth to Capernaum Capernaum was by the Sea (or Lake) of Galilee, roughly 40 miles away from Nazareth. That means it was a walk of several days. Walking there involved a drop in elevation of more than 1,800 feet (which means a walk back to Nazareth would require a climb of more than 1,800 feet). How do you think Mary feels about Jesus moving to this bigger city, relatively far away? Matthew 4:18-22 Jesus starts calling disciples How do you think Mary feels as she watches Jesus begin to call strangers to himself, teach them, and build a following? What is our role as we watch someone who was previously ‘under” us (or in our charge) begin to spread their wings and move out in more independent directions? (This might be a child who is growing up, a work colleague or mentee, a fellow church member who takes on a new responsibility – for example, as a new Bible Study leader, or other situations.) How should we handle that change, and what should we do if we find the transition hard? Before we look at our next passage, let’s consider two background questions: In John 1:35-51, John tells us that Jesus went to see John the Baptist, who was baptizing people a long way away from Galilee at the Jordan River, and then Jesus returned to Galilee and gathered some disciples. He had not performed any overt miracles yet; it appears that he was just teaching. Why do you think he started with teaching and not with miracles? At this point in his life, Jesus is 30. He is fully God, and he is also fully human. How do you think he feels about his mother Mary? John 2:1-12 The wedding feast at Cana In verse 3, Mary does not make a specific request of Jesus: she just identifies the existence of a problem. Why do you think she approaches it that way? Are there times when a little vagueness or ambiguity, like Mary practices here, is a good idea? Explain. Jesus’s response in verse 4 is literally, “What, to me and to you, woman?” This is a Hebrew expression that was used to suggest indifference to the concern of the other person while leaving the outcome ambiguous. When someone said this, sometimes the request was fulfilled and sometimes it was rejected. Why do you think Jesus initially chooses this ambiguous response? Jesus calls Mary “woman.” The scholars generally think that this was not necessarily rude but that it did show that he was not responding based on his familial connection with her. Some think he is indicating in advance that if he does a “sign” or miracle here, it will be by his own decision in accordance with his Father’s will, not because of some human weakness in giving in to his mother. On the other hand, Jesus often did things only if people asked – healings, for example. So perhaps it was a decision that depended on two factors: first, that it would be done only if he decided it fit with God’s will, but second, only if people cared enough to press him and trusted him enough to obey him. Jesus has not yet done any miracles. Yet Mary sends the servers to him. Why do you think she puts her son on the spot in that way? In verse 5, what does Mary tell the servers? “Do whatever he tells you.” How is Mary’s direction in verse 5 appropriate for us? How can we apply it in our lives? How can you know what Jesus is telling you to do? In verses 7-8, the servers don’t know why they are doing what they have been told to do, but they do it. How might that be a guide for everything we do in our lives? What gets in the way of our doing what Jesus tells us to do? How might we work to overcome our reluctance to obey Jesus? Think about Mary’s approach in bringing her concern to Jesus. How might it be a good model for us in bringing our concerns to Jesus? She did not hesitate to bring the problem to Jesus. She did not try to tell Jesus how to solve the problem but trusted him to handle it in the best way. She encouraged others to trust Jesus for how to deal with the problem they faced. How can you grow in the kind of confidence Mary has, that Jesus can be trusted to deal with your problems? Take a step back and consider this: Mary does not know what is coming next, but she believes in Jesus. Jesus has not shown his power yet. She has not seen his miracles or his resurrection. What she has is faith and the stories she has stored up and treasured for 30 years ago about God’s work in her life. We (or at least most of us) have not been visited by an angel. But we have stories of what God has done in the past in our lives. And we know Jesus’s power and that he has risen from the dead and is still alive today. What we share with Mary is that Jesus is alive and involved in our lives right now. Is there a concern you think it would be good to bring to Jesus, or some matter where you feel called to trust in him that if you bring it to him, he can do something about it? Bring the matter to him now, without feeling like you need to tell him how to solve the problem. What would Jesus tell you about your concern? Hear Mary’s words – “Do whatever he tells you” – whispering in your ears. What do you think Jesus is asking you to do right now? Is it consistent with what the rest of Scripture has already taught you? (That’s a check to make sure you are on a solid path.) If so, can you do what he is telling you to do now? How? Bibliography See Mary - Bibliography at https://www.faithexplored.com/mary/bibliography . Copyright © 2025, Tom Faletti (Faith Explored, www.faithexplored.com ). This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without alteration, for nonprofit use, provided such reproductions are not sold and include this copyright notice or a similar acknowledgement that includes a reference to Faith Explored and www.faithexplored.com. See www.faithexplored.com for more materials like this. Previous Mary List Next